136-001 · page 3
…up from his throne, and went outside into the vestibule of the court of his palace; and there he saw the demon, shuddering and trembling. And he said to him: "Who art thou?" And the demon answered: "I am called Ornias." 10. And Solomon said to him: "Tell me, O demon, to what zodiacal sign thou art subject." And he answered: "To the Water-pourer. And those who are consumed with desire for the noble virgins upon earth[...], these I strangle. But in case there is no disposition to sleep, I am changed into three forms. Whenever men come to be enamoured of women, I metamorphose myself into a comely female; and I take hold of the men in their sleep, and play with them. And after a while I again take to my wings, and hide me to the heavenly regions. I also appear as a lion, and I am commanded by all the demons. I am offspring of the archan…
Reader A none, low confidence
Nothing can honestly be restored here.
Conybeare notes (p. 3 n. 7) that the sole Greek witness (MS Paris gr. 500) is grammatically corrupt or defective here; no parallel witness supplies the missing words.
Reader B parallel, high confidence
"I strangle those who reside in Aquarius because of their passion for women whose zodiacal sign is Virgo."
Conybeare noted the lacuna; the published D-text printed in McCown, The Testament of Solomon (1922) and in later synopses supplies the clause that sits between "noble virgins upon earth" and "these I strangle."
Reader C none, n/a confidence
Nothing can honestly be restored here.
Grammar constrains this without determining it. The words after the break, ", these I strangle", resume with a demonstrative that must pick up the accusative group already named before the break ("those who are consumed with desire for the noble virgins upon earth"), so the missing material was a further qualification of that same group and introduced no new subject. That is all the syntax yields. I also record a doubt about the premise: the Testament of Solomon survives in late Greek manuscripts, not in a physically damaged ancient book, and the ellipsis here sits inside a sentence, immediately before its punctuation. It is more likely the translator's mark for a phrase he could not construe or chose not to render than a hole in a leaf. Without the Greek I cannot tell which, and I will not supply a clause to a sentence that may never have lost one.